Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2010-11-09 13:04:34
Size: 2992
Editor: SaraAubry
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2010-11-09 13:06:01
Size: 3045
Editor: SaraAubry
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 39: Line 39:
ONB:
0,1 – 0,2 FTE for both Michaela and Andreas on studies and development
KB-SB:
in 2010: nothing on development
in 2011:
1 FTE out of 1,6 FTE Soeren, Mikis, Jonas?, Colin on development
?? Tue, Christen and Claus on development coordination
0,4 out of 0,8 FTE Jon, Karen on studies
?? out of 1 FTE Sabine, Jens, Charlotte, Lisbeth, Ditte on studies
BnF:
1 FTE out of 1,5 FTE Nicolas, Yann + outsourcing possibilities for development and design
?? Sara on studies and coordination
1 FTE Annick, Peter, Geraldine on studies
NAS Program management: 2 days/month for Sara, 0,5 days/month for Gildas
__ONB:__

 *
0,1 – 0,2 FTE for both Michaela and Andreas on studies and development

__
KB/SB__:

 *
in 2010: nothing on development
 * in 2011: 1 FTE out of 1,6 FTE Soeren, Mikis, Jonas?, Colin on development
 * ?? Tue, Christen and Claus on development coordination
 * 0,4 out of 0,8 FTE Jon, Karen on studies
 * ?? out of 1 FTE Sabine, Jens, Charlotte, Lisbeth, Ditte on studies

__
BnF:__
 *
1 FTE out of 1,5 FTE Nicolas, Yann + outsourcing possibilities for development and design
 * ?? Sara on studies and coordination
 * 1 FTE Annick, Peter, Geraldine on studies
 * NAS Program management: 2 days/month for Sara, 0,5 days/month for Gildas

Brief for the NetarchiveSuite Workshop September 2010

Presentations

- Presentation of each institution’s agenda and main projects: review of past events (since last workshop in May 2009) and focus on upcoming projects :

presentations ONB, BnF, KB/SB (link your presentations here)

- NetarchiveSuite: community and framework, objectives of the workshop (presentation)

Sum-up from Technical Session discussions (Nicolas)

Sum-up from Curator Session discussions

The Curator Session agenda was split into 3 parts:

1) The first part consisted in sharing about experience (practices, tips, questions and issues) using NetarchiveSuite and Heritrix for broad and selective crawls. Discussions went over selection, configuration, monitoring, QA and documentation processes and procedures. (BnF initially prepared a presentation that was not used during the meeting because discussions were rather informal).

2) The second part was about the wish list: curators discussed their needs at the operational level. Some needs concerned small features, other larger developments (see below).

3) During the third part, we discussed tools the NetarchiveSuite curator community could use to exist and communicate.

Tools:

  • A mailing list called netarchivesuite-curators dedicated to curatorial issues.
  • A dedicated space on the Wiki to share documentation.
  • A FAQ created collaboratively.
  • A space for joint projects.

Documents:

  • A more functional road map + time frame of the developments.
  • Schedule of stable releases and content of these releases.
  • Review of current user manual.

Meetings:

  • An annual brainstorming meeting.
  • Visits, practical training based on the observation of practices and production environment (a few days should be enough to see the entire process // there is need to arrange schedules with crawls maybe during an event and a possibility to enlarge to topics other than web archiving).

Wish Lists

Development resources

ONB:

  • 0,1 – 0,2 FTE for both Michaela and Andreas on studies and development

KB/SB:

  • in 2010: nothing on development
  • in 2011: 1 FTE out of 1,6 FTE Soeren, Mikis, Jonas?, Colin on development
  • ?? Tue, Christen and Claus on development coordination
  • 0,4 out of 0,8 FTE Jon, Karen on studies
  • ?? out of 1 FTE Sabine, Jens, Charlotte, Lisbeth, Ditte on studies

BnF:

  • 1 FTE out of 1,5 FTE Nicolas, Yann + outsourcing possibilities for development and design
  • ?? Sara on studies and coordination
  • 1 FTE Annick, Peter, Geraldine on studies
  • NAS Program management: 2 days/month for Sara, 0,5 days/month for Gildas

Follow-up from the Workshop

Need for each institution to decide priorities and compare resources and priorities (end of 2010).

Merge them into a roadmap (january 2011).

BriefWorkshopSept2010 (last edited 2010-11-18 12:59:11 by SaraAubry)