Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2008-01-11 13:44:13
Size: 2198
Editor: EldZierau
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2008-01-11 13:46:13
Size: 1918
Editor: EldZierau
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
Line 11: Line 10:
For details on how to do a review, see [:Code_Review_Process:Code Review Process]. For details on how to do a review, see ["Code Review Process"].
Line 13: Line 12:
|| <Link to code review page for class/JSP-page named with java path name, f.ex. dk.netarkivet.harvestdefinition.JobDAO> || <SVN version of code being reviewed> || <Lines/parts to review> || <Reference to task caused the code changes that are being reviewed as for example a bugs, a feature request or an assignment> || <Initials of author of changes in code> || <Initials of reviewer in code review> || <Date that review was held on form YYYY/MM/DD> || <Initials of person to do follow-up on code review> || <Must be either [[BR]] '''''Ok''''' (no further action), [[BR]] '''''Ok w/postponed''''' (no further action within this iteration, but includes postpones to be done later)> || ||[[CommonDistributeArcrepositoryARCLookupReview][dk.netarkivet.common.distribute.arcrepository.ARCLookup]] ||212||147-150 ||Bug #1079||LC || || <Date that review was held on form YYYY/MM/DD> || <Initials of person to do follow-up on code review> || <Must be either [[BR]] '''''Ok''''' (no further action), [[BR]] '''''Ok w/postponed''''' (no further action within this iteration, but includes postpones to be done later)> ||

Reviews in iteration 33

Review of code should happen immediately after coding for a task or bug is done, so as little as possible is based on unreviewed code.

If the reviewer for some reason cannot be contacted within a reasonable timeframe, another reviewer should be chosen.

We don't register review time as separate from coding time.

For details on how to do a review, see ["Code Review Process"].

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Class/Page]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Version]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Parts/lines]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Task]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Author(s)]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Reviewer(s)]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Review date]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Follow-up]

[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Done]

CommonDistributeArcrepositoryARCLookupReview][dk.netarkivet.common.distribute.arcrepository.ARCLookup

212

147-150

Bug #1079

LC

<Date that review was held on form YYYY/MM/DD>

<Initials of person to do follow-up on code review>

<Must be either BR Ok (no further action), BR Ok w/postponed (no further action within this iteration, but includes postpones to be done later)>

Iteration33ReviewsOverview (last edited 2010-08-16 10:24:31 by localhost)