NetarchiveSuiteReviews in iteration 33
Review of code should happen immediately after coding for a task or bug is done, so as little as possible is based on unreviewed code.
If the reviewer for some reason cannot be contacted within a reasonable timeframe, another reviewer should be chosen.
We don't register review time as separate from coding time.
For details on how to do a review, see ["Code Review Process"].
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Class/Page] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Version] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Parts/lines] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Task] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Author(s)] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Reviewer(s)] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Review date] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Follow-up] |
[:Code Review Process#TableFilledReviewsOverview:Done] |
212 |
147-150 |
Bug #1079 |
LC |
|
<Date that review was held on form YYYY/MM/DD> |
<Initials of person to do follow-up on code review> |
<Must be either BR Ok (no further action), BR Ok w/postponed (no further action within this iteration, but includes postpones to be done later)> |