~+'''Reviews in Iteration 41'''+~<
> ~-Use IterationReviewsOverviewTemplate template to start new review pages.-~ Contains: ~-[[#CodeReViewTplCrTable|Code Review Table]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplOrTable|Document Review Table]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplCrColumns|Code Review Column Description]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplOrColumns|Document Review Column Description]]-~ <> '''''Code Reviews'''''<
> Description of columns can be found in section [[#CodeReViewTplCrColumns|Explanation of the columns in Code Review table]]. <
> For details on how to do a code review, see [[Process/Code Review|Code Review Process]]. <
> Code Reviews are done in the review-tool Crucible: [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/|Link to Crucible]], export is done via [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/plugins/servlet/export|Crucible export function]] <
> Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode: <
> `|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX] || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNsXX || INIT || - || - || - ||` ||'''Review Id''' <
> ~-NS-XX-~ ||'''Task''' <
> ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||'''Author(s)'''<
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Reviewer(s)''' <
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Review date''' <
> ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||'''Issues found''' <
> ~-IssuesFromNsXX-~ ||'''Follow-up''' <
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Done''' <
> ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ ||'''Releasetest''' <
> excl. or incl. TEST case.item and status ||'''Manuals''' <
> Manual page(s)/chapter(s) || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-131|NS-131]] || FR 1846 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs131 || JOLF || OK || Try adding a bitpreservation databasedir to the admin machine. ||Installation Manual section 3.2.1 and 4.2.1. || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-132|NS-132]] || Bug 1844 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs132 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-133|NS-133]] || Bug 1845 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs133 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-134|NS-134]] || Bug 1834 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs134 || JOLF || OK || Change the checksum file and correct them without restart. || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-135|NS-135]] || Bug 1836 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs135 || JOLF || OK || N/A || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-136|NS-136]] || FR 1790 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs136 || HBK || OK || Confirmed by running RunNetarchiveSuite.sh without parameters. || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-137|NS-137]] || Bug 1832 || JOLF || CSR || 2010/01/22 || IssuesFromNs137 || N/A || OK || Test by running setup with a checksum replica. Perform a harvest an check that the upload time to the checksum replica is less than 1 min. || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-138|NS-138]] || Bug 1727 and 1764 || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/04 || IssuesFromNs138 || JOLF || OK || Release test 11 + run a batchjob from a jar file, which does not contain the batchjob method. || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-140|NS-140]] || FR 1861 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs140 || HBK || OK || Should be confirmed in GUI || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-141|NS-141]] || -- || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs141 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-142|NS-142]] || FR 1578 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs142 ||CSR ||OK || Introduced settings instead of constant || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-143|NS-143]] || FR 1116 || CSR || SVC || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs143 || CSR ||OK || Required ||User Manual Section 6 || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-144|NS-144]] || FR 1580 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs144 || HBK ||OK || Start standalone app with -v or --version || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-145|NS-145]] || FR 1823 and Assignment B.2.2b || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs145 || JOLF || OK || Try sending a GetAllFilenamesMessage, a GetAllChecksumsMessage and a GetChecksumMessage to the bamon (default through the bitpreservation page). In the log of the bamon it should say "replying to converted batchjob". || Perhaps System Design? || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/MG-8|MG-8]] || Task 52 IT 41 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromMg8 || HBK || OK || None || - || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-146|NS-146]] || Miscellaneous refactoring || SVC || JOLF || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs146 || SVC ||OK ||Change releasetest to use new package name for HarvestTemplateApplication ||Additional tools || || [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-139|NS-139]] || Updated netarkivet.css so it is consistent in its style. || HBK || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs139 || HBK || OK || - || - || <> '''''Document Reviews'''''<
> Description of columns can be found in section [[#CodeReViewTplOrColumns|Explanation of the columns in Document Review table]].<
> For details on how to other reviews, see [[Process/Document Review|Document Review Process]].<
> Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode:<
> `|| [:DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview:DocName] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||` ||'''Document''' <
> ~-`[:link:docName]`-~ ||'''Version''' <
> ~-X.Y/date-~ ||'''Lines/parts''' <
> ~-All/x-y-~ ||'''Task''' <
> ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||'''Author(s)'''<
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Reviewer(s)''' <
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Review date''' <
> ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||'''Follow-up''' <
> ~-INIT-~ ||'''Done''' <
> ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ || || [[DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview|DocName]] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - || <> '''''Explanation of the columns in Code Review table:''''' * "Review Id": The Crucible Review Id which the review is created under in Crucible. Normally name is on form NS-XX, i.e. text to be inserted is `[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX]` * "Task": The assignment or tracker issue that the code has been updated for, e.g. Bug 1512. * "Author(s)": The person(s) who have made changes or additions to the code. Only Initials are given, e.g. ELZI. * "Reviewer(s)": The person(s) who have not been involved in coding these changes, who will participate in the review. * "Review date": Date for review. * "Issues found": Link to wiki page with issues found under review (and mandays of work). Normally on form IssuesFromNsXX. * "Follow-up": The person who will do the follow-up on the review specified under 'Issues found'. * "Done": whether the review follow-up has been done. Has value "'''-'''" if new, "'''OK'''" if all follow-ups are done, "'''OK-wp'''" (with postpones) if follow-ups are done with exceptions that have been postponed. * "Release Test": Whether the changes are to be included in the Release test. Has values "'''-'''" if new, "'''incl.'''" if it is to be included in the release test and "'''excl.'''" if it cannot be included in the release test (e.g. if not testable). * "Manuals": The manuals that has to be/is updated as a concequence of the change. Has values "'''-'''" if new, "'''Quick'''" for [[Quick Start Manual devel|Quick Start Manual]], "'''Deploy'''" for [[Deploy Manual devel|Deploy Manual]], "'''Conf.'''" for [[Configuration Manual devel|Configuration Manual]], "'''Inst..'''" for [[Installation Manual devel|Installation Manual]], "'''Dev.'''" for [[Developer Manual devel|Developer Manual]], "'''User'''" for [[User Manual devel|User Manual]]. <> '''''Explanation of the columns in Document Review table:''''' * "Document": Link to issue review page for document named with identification of the document, e.g. http://netarchive.dk/suite/AssignmentDeploy1 - See example in [Iteration 36]. * "Version": The SVN, CVS or date for revision of document/script to be reviewed. * "Parts/lines": Specifies the parts of the document/script to review (if less that the whole file). * "Task": The assignment or tracker issue that the code has been updated for, e.g. Bug 1512. * "Author(s)": The person(s) who have made changes or additions to the code. Only Initials are given, e.g. ELZI. * "Reviewer(s)": The person(s) who have not been involved in coding these changes, who will participate in the review. * "Review date": Date for review. * "Follow-up": The person who will do the follow-up on the review specified under 'Issues found'. * "Done": whether the review follow-up has been done. Has value "'''-'''" if new, "'''OK'''" if all follow-ups are done, "'''OK-wp'''" (with postpones) if follow-ups are done with exceptions that have been postponed.