NetarchiveSuiteReviews in Iteration <XX>
Review of code should happen immediately after coding for a task or bug is done, so as little as possible is based on unreviewed code.
If the reviewer for some reason cannot be contacted within a reasonable time frame, another reviewer should be chosen.
Implementation time including coding, documentation and review is noted under information on issues found.
For details on how to do a code review, see [:Process/Code_Review_WithTitle:Code Review Process].
Crucible Review Id |
Task |
Author(s) |
Reviewer(s) |
Review date |
Issues found |
Follow-up |
Done |
<Crucible Review Id linking to Crucible named NS-<id>> |
<Reference to task caused the code changes that are being reviewed as for example a bugs, a feature request or an assignment> |
<Initials of author(s) of changes in code> |
<Initials of reviewer(s) in code review> |
<Date that review was held on form YYYY/MM/DD> |
<Link to wiki page named IssuesFoundInNs<id> which will contain infomraion on issues found in review from Crucible> |
<Initials of person to do follow-up on code review> |
<Must be either BR Ok (no further action), BR Ok w/postponed (no further action within this iteration, but includes postpones to be done later)> |
For details on how to other reviews, see [:Process/Other_Review_WithTitle:Code Review Process].