Differences between revisions 42 and 43
Revision 42 as of 2010-02-09 13:13:21
Size: 9816
Editor: HenrikKirk
Comment:
Revision 43 as of 2010-08-16 10:25:17
Size: 9875
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
~+'''Reviews in Iteration 41'''+~[[BR]] ~-Use IterationReviewsOverviewTemplate template to start new review pages.-~ ~+'''Reviews in Iteration 41'''+~<<BR>> ~-Use IterationReviewsOverviewTemplate template to start new review pages.-~
Line 3: Line 3:
Contains: ~-[#CodeReViewTplCrTable Code Review Table]-~, ~-[#CodeReViewTplOrTable Document Review Table]-~, ~-[#CodeReViewTplCrColumns Code Review Column Description]-~, ~-[#CodeReViewTplOrColumns Document Review Column Description]-~ Contains: ~-[[#CodeReViewTplCrTable|Code Review Table]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplOrTable|Document Review Table]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplCrColumns|Code Review Column Description]]-~, ~-[[#CodeReViewTplOrColumns|Document Review Column Description]]-~
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Anchor(CodeReViewTplCrTable)]] '''''Code Reviews'''''[[BR]] Description of columns can be found in section [#CodeReViewTplCrColumns Explanation of the columns in Code Review table]. [[BR]] For details on how to do a code review, see [:Process/Code Review:Code Review Process]. [[BR]] Code Reviews are done in the review-tool Crucible: [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/ Link to Crucible], export is done via [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/plugins/servlet/export Crucible export function] [[BR]] Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode: [[BR]] `|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX] || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNsXX || INIT || - || - || - ||`
||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review Id''' [[BR]] ~-NS-XX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Task''' [[BR]] ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Author(s)'''[[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Reviewer(s)''' [[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review date''' [[BR]] ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Issues found''' [[BR]] ~-IssuesFromNsXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Follow-up''' [[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Done''' [[BR]] ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Releasetest''' [[BR]] excl. or incl. TEST case.item and status ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Manuals''' [[BR]] Manual page(s)/chapter(s) ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-131 NS-131
] || FR 1846 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs131 || JOLF || OK || Try adding a bitpreservation databasedir to the admin machine. ||Installation Manual section 3.2.1 and 4.2.1. ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-132 NS-132] || Bug 1844 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs132 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-133 NS-133] || Bug 1845 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs133 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-134 NS-134] || Bug 1834 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs134 || JOLF || OK || Change the checksum file and correct them without restart. || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-135 NS-135] || Bug 1836 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs135 || JOLF || OK || N/A || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-136 NS-136] || FR 1790 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs136 || HBK || OK || Confirmed by running RunNetarchiveSuite.sh without parameters. || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-137 NS-137] || Bug 1832 || JOLF || CSR || 2010/01/22 || IssuesFromNs137 || N/A || OK || Test by running setup with a checksum replica. Perform a harvest an check that the upload time to the checksum replica is less than 1 min. || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-138 NS-138] || Bug 1727 and 1764 || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/04 || IssuesFromNs138 || JOLF || OK || Release test 11 + run a batchjob from a jar file, which does not contain the batchjob method. || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-140 NS-140] || FR 1861 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs140 || HBK || OK || Should be confirmed in GUI || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-141 NS-141] || -- || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs141 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-142 NS-142] || FR 1578 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs142 ||CSR ||OK || Introduced settings instead of constant || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-143 NS-143] || FR 1116 || CSR || SVC || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs143 || CSR ||OK || Required ||User Manual Section 6 ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-144 NS-144] || FR 1580 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs144 || HBK ||OK || Start standalone app with -v or --version || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-145 NS-145] || FR 1823 and Assignment B.2.2b || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs145 || JOLF || OK || Try sending a GetAllFilenamesMessage, a GetAllChecksumsMessage and a GetChecksumMessage to the bamon (default through the bitpreservation page). In the log of the bamon it should say "replying to converted batchjob". || Perhaps System Design? ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/MG-8 MG-8] || Task 52 IT 41 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromMg8 || HBK || OK || None || - ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-146 NS-146] || Miscellaneous refactoring || SVC || JOLF || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs146 || SVC ||OK ||Change releasetest to use new package name for HarvestTemplateApplication ||Additional tools ||
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-139 NS-139] || Updated netarkivet.css so it is consistent in its style. || HBK || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs139 || HBK || OK || - || - ||
<<Anchor(CodeReViewTplCrTable)>> '''''Code Reviews'''''<<BR>> Description of columns can be found in section [[#CodeReViewTplCrColumns|Explanation of the columns in Code Review table]]. <<BR>> For details on how to do a code review, see [[Process/Code Review|Code Review Process]]. <<BR>> Code Reviews are done in the review-tool Crucible: [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/|Link to Crucible]], export is done via [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/plugins/servlet/export|Crucible export function]] <<BR>> Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode: <<BR>> `|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX] || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNsXX || INIT || - || - || - ||`
||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review Id''' <<BR>> ~-NS-XX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Task''' <<BR>> ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Author(s)'''<<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Reviewer(s)''' <<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review date''' <<BR>> ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Issues found''' <<BR>> ~-IssuesFromNsXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Follow-up''' <<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Done''' <<BR>> ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Releasetest''' <<BR>> excl. or incl. TEST case.item and status ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Manuals''' <<BR>> Manual page(s)/chapter(s) ||
||
[[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-131|NS-131]] || FR 1846 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs131 || JOLF || OK || Try adding a bitpreservation databasedir to the admin machine. ||Installation Manual section 3.2.1 and 4.2.1. ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-132|NS-132]] || Bug 1844 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs132 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-133|NS-133]] || Bug 1845 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs133 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-134|NS-134]] || Bug 1834 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs134 || JOLF || OK || Change the checksum file and correct them without restart. || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-135|NS-135]] || Bug 1836 || JOLF || HBK || 2010/01/15 || IssuesFromNs135 || JOLF || OK || N/A || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-136|NS-136]] || FR 1790 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs136 || HBK || OK || Confirmed by running RunNetarchiveSuite.sh without parameters. || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-137|NS-137]] || Bug 1832 || JOLF || CSR || 2010/01/22 || IssuesFromNs137 || N/A || OK || Test by running setup with a checksum replica. Perform a harvest an check that the upload time to the checksum replica is less than 1 min. || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-138|NS-138]] || Bug 1727 and 1764 || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/04 || IssuesFromNs138 || JOLF || OK || Release test 11 + run a batchjob from a jar file, which does not contain the batchjob method. || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-140|NS-140]] || FR 1861 || HBK || JOLF || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromNs140 || HBK || OK || Should be confirmed in GUI || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-141|NS-141]] || -- || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/21 || IssuesFromNs141 || HBK || OK || No test needed || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-142|NS-142]] || FR 1578 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs142 ||CSR ||OK || Introduced settings instead of constant || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-143|NS-143]] || FR 1116 || CSR || SVC || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs143 || CSR ||OK || Required ||User Manual Section 6 ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-144|NS-144]] || FR 1580 || HBK || CSR || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNs144 || HBK ||OK || Start standalone app with -v or --version || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-145|NS-145]] || FR 1823 and Assignment B.2.2b || JOLF || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs145 || JOLF || OK || Try sending a GetAllFilenamesMessage, a GetAllChecksumsMessage and a GetChecksumMessage to the bamon (default through the bitpreservation page). In the log of the bamon it should say "replying to converted batchjob". || Perhaps System Design? ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/MG-8|MG-8]] || Task 52 IT 41 || HBK || SVC || 2010/01/26 || IssuesFromMg8 || HBK || OK || None || - ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-146|NS-146]] || Miscellaneous refactoring || SVC || JOLF || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs146 || SVC ||OK ||Change releasetest to use new package name for HarvestTemplateApplication ||Additional tools ||
|| [[http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-139|NS-139]] || Updated netarkivet.css so it is consistent in its style. || HBK || SVC || 2010/02/08 || IssuesFromNs139 || HBK || OK || - || - ||
Line 26: Line 26:
[[Anchor(CodeReViewTplOrTable)]] '''''Document Reviews'''''[[BR]] Description of columns can be found in section [#CodeReViewTplOrColumns Explanation of the columns in Document Review table].[[BR]] For details on how to other reviews, see [:Process/Document Review:Document Review Process].[[BR]] Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode:[[BR]] `|| [:DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview:DocName] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||`
||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Document''' [[BR]] ~-`[:link:docName]`-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Version''' [[BR]] ~-X.Y/date-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Lines/parts''' [[BR]] ~-All/x-y-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Task''' [[BR]] ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Author(s)'''[[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Reviewer(s)''' [[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review date''' [[BR]] ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Follow-up''' [[BR]] ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Done''' [[BR]] ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ ||
|| [:DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview:DocName] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||
<<Anchor(CodeReViewTplOrTable)>> '''''Document Reviews'''''<<BR>> Description of columns can be found in section [[#CodeReViewTplOrColumns|Explanation of the columns in Document Review table]].<<BR>> For details on how to other reviews, see [[Process/Document Review|Document Review Process]].<<BR>> Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode:<<BR>> `|| [:DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview:DocName] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||`
||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Document''' <<BR>> ~-`[:link:docName]`-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Version''' <<BR>> ~-X.Y/date-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Lines/parts''' <<BR>> ~-All/x-y-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Task''' <<BR>> ~-Bug/FR XXX-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Author(s)'''<<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Reviewer(s)''' <<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Review date''' <<BR>> ~-YYYY/MM/DD-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Follow-up''' <<BR>> ~-INIT-~ ||<bgcolor="#dddddd" style="text-align: center;">'''Done''' <<BR>> ~--, OK, OK-wp-~ ||
|| [[DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview|DocName]] || Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||
Line 31: Line 31:
[[Anchor(CodeReViewTplCrColumns)]] '''''Explanation of the columns in Code Review table:''''' <<Anchor(CodeReViewTplCrColumns)>> '''''Explanation of the columns in Code Review table:'''''
Line 42: Line 42:
 * "Manuals": The manuals that has to be/is updated as a concequence of the change. Has values "'''-'''" if new, "'''Quick'''" for [:Quick Start Manual devel:Quick Start Manual], "'''Deploy'''" for [:Deploy Manual devel:Deploy Manual], "'''Conf.'''" for [:Configuration Manual devel:Configuration Manual], "'''Inst..'''" for [:Installation Manual devel:Installation Manual], "'''Dev.'''" for [:Developer Manual devel:Developer Manual], "'''User'''" for [:User Manual devel:User Manual].
[[Anchor(CodeReViewTplOrColumns)]] '''''Explanation of the columns in Document Review table:'''''
 * "Manuals": The manuals that has to be/is updated as a concequence of the change. Has values "'''-'''" if new, "'''Quick'''" for [[Quick Start Manual devel|Quick Start Manual]], "'''Deploy'''" for [[Deploy Manual devel|Deploy Manual]], "'''Conf.'''" for [[Configuration Manual devel|Configuration Manual]], "'''Inst..'''" for [[Installation Manual devel|Installation Manual]], "'''Dev.'''" for [[Developer Manual devel|Developer Manual]], "'''User'''" for [[User Manual devel|User Manual]].
<<Anchor(CodeReViewTplOrColumns)>> '''''Explanation of the columns in Document Review table:'''''

Reviews in Iteration 41
Use IterationReviewsOverviewTemplate template to start new review pages.

Contains: Code Review Table, Document Review Table, Code Review Column Description, Document Review Column Description

Code Reviews
Description of columns can be found in section Explanation of the columns in Code Review table.
For details on how to do a code review, see Code Review Process.
Code Reviews are done in the review-tool Crucible: Link to Crucible, export is done via Crucible export function
Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode:
|| [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX] || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || IssuesFromNsXX || INIT || - || - || - ||

Review Id
NS-XX

Task
Bug/FR XXX

Author(s)
INIT

Reviewer(s)
INIT

Review date
YYYY/MM/DD

Issues found
IssuesFromNsXX

Follow-up
INIT

Done
-, OK, OK-wp

Releasetest
excl. or incl. TEST case.item and status

Manuals
Manual page(s)/chapter(s)

NS-131

FR 1846

JOLF

HBK

2010/01/15

IssuesFromNs131

JOLF

OK

Try adding a bitpreservation databasedir to the admin machine.

Installation Manual section 3.2.1 and 4.2.1.

NS-132

Bug 1844

HBK

SVC

2010/01/21

IssuesFromNs132

HBK

OK

No test needed

-

NS-133

Bug 1845

HBK

SVC

2010/01/21

IssuesFromNs133

HBK

OK

No test needed

-

NS-134

Bug 1834

JOLF

HBK

2010/01/15

IssuesFromNs134

JOLF

OK

Change the checksum file and correct them without restart.

-

NS-135

Bug 1836

JOLF

HBK

2010/01/15

IssuesFromNs135

JOLF

OK

N/A

-

NS-136

FR 1790

HBK

JOLF

2010/01/26

IssuesFromNs136

HBK

OK

Confirmed by running RunNetarchiveSuite.sh without parameters.

-

NS-137

Bug 1832

JOLF

CSR

2010/01/22

IssuesFromNs137

N/A

OK

Test by running setup with a checksum replica. Perform a harvest an check that the upload time to the checksum replica is less than 1 min.

-

NS-138

Bug 1727 and 1764

JOLF

SVC

2010/02/04

IssuesFromNs138

JOLF

OK

Release test 11 + run a batchjob from a jar file, which does not contain the batchjob method.

-

NS-140

FR 1861

HBK

JOLF

2010/01/26

IssuesFromNs140

HBK

OK

Should be confirmed in GUI

-

NS-141

--

HBK

SVC

2010/01/21

IssuesFromNs141

HBK

OK

No test needed

-

NS-142

FR 1578

HBK

CSR

YYYY/MM/DD

IssuesFromNs142

CSR

OK

Introduced settings instead of constant

-

NS-143

FR 1116

CSR

SVC

YYYY/MM/DD

IssuesFromNs143

CSR

OK

Required

User Manual Section 6

NS-144

FR 1580

HBK

CSR

YYYY/MM/DD

IssuesFromNs144

HBK

OK

Start standalone app with -v or --version

-

NS-145

FR 1823 and Assignment B.2.2b

JOLF

SVC

2010/02/08

IssuesFromNs145

JOLF

OK

Try sending a GetAllFilenamesMessage, a GetAllChecksumsMessage and a GetChecksumMessage to the bamon (default through the bitpreservation page). In the log of the bamon it should say "replying to converted batchjob".

Perhaps System Design?

MG-8

Task 52 IT 41

HBK

SVC

2010/01/26

IssuesFromMg8

HBK

OK

None

-

NS-146

Miscellaneous refactoring

SVC

JOLF

2010/02/08

IssuesFromNs146

SVC

OK

Change releasetest to use new package name for HarvestTemplateApplication

Additional tools

NS-139

Updated netarkivet.css so it is consistent in its style.

HBK

SVC

2010/02/08

IssuesFromNs139

HBK

OK

-

-

Document Reviews
Description of columns can be found in section Explanation of the columns in Document Review table.
For details on how to other reviews, see Document Review Process.
Template for insertion of a new line in edit mode:
|| [:DocumentReview/DocNameIdReview:DocName] ||  Version || Lines || Bug/FR XXX || INIT || INIT || YYYY/MM/DD || INIT || - ||

Document
[:link:docName]

Version
X.Y/date

Lines/parts
All/x-y

Task
Bug/FR XXX

Author(s)
INIT

Reviewer(s)
INIT

Review date
YYYY/MM/DD

Follow-up
INIT

Done
-, OK, OK-wp

DocName

Version

Lines

Bug/FR XXX

INIT

INIT

YYYY/MM/DD

INIT

-

Explanation of the columns in Code Review table:

  • "Review Id": The Crucible Review Id which the review is created under in Crucible. Normally name is on form NS-XX, i.e. text to be inserted is [http://kb-prod-udv-001.kb.dk:8060/cru/NS-XX NS-XX]

  • "Task": The assignment or tracker issue that the code has been updated for, e.g. Bug 1512.
  • "Author(s)": The person(s) who have made changes or additions to the code. Only Initials are given, e.g. ELZI.
  • "Reviewer(s)": The person(s) who have not been involved in coding these changes, who will participate in the review.
  • "Review date": Date for review.
  • "Issues found": Link to wiki page with issues found under review (and mandays of work). Normally on form IssuesFromNsXX.
  • "Follow-up": The person who will do the follow-up on the review specified under 'Issues found'.
  • "Done": whether the review follow-up has been done. Has value "-" if new, "OK" if all follow-ups are done, "OK-wp" (with postpones) if follow-ups are done with exceptions that have been postponed.

  • "Release Test": Whether the changes are to be included in the Release test. Has values "-" if new, "incl." if it is to be included in the release test and "excl." if it cannot be included in the release test (e.g. if not testable).

  • "Manuals": The manuals that has to be/is updated as a concequence of the change. Has values "-" if new, "Quick" for Quick Start Manual, "Deploy" for Deploy Manual, "Conf." for Configuration Manual, "Inst.." for Installation Manual, "Dev." for Developer Manual, "User" for User Manual.

Explanation of the columns in Document Review table:

  • "Document": Link to issue review page for document named with identification of the document, e.g. http://netarchive.dk/suite/AssignmentDeploy1 - See example in [Iteration 36].

  • "Version": The SVN, CVS or date for revision of document/script to be reviewed.
  • "Parts/lines": Specifies the parts of the document/script to review (if less that the whole file).
  • "Task": The assignment or tracker issue that the code has been updated for, e.g. Bug 1512.
  • "Author(s)": The person(s) who have made changes or additions to the code. Only Initials are given, e.g. ELZI.
  • "Reviewer(s)": The person(s) who have not been involved in coding these changes, who will participate in the review.
  • "Review date": Date for review.
  • "Follow-up": The person who will do the follow-up on the review specified under 'Issues found'.
  • "Done": whether the review follow-up has been done. Has value "-" if new, "OK" if all follow-ups are done, "OK-wp" (with postpones) if follow-ups are done with exceptions that have been postponed.

Iteration41ReviewsOverview (last edited 2010-08-16 10:25:17 by localhost)